<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steelers 2009 Offensive Line Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steelersdepot.com/2010/02/steelers-2009-offensive-line-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steelersdepot.com/2010/02/steelers-2009-offensive-line-stats/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=steelers-2009-offensive-line-stats</link>
	<description>Pittsburgh Steelers blog featuring news, discussion &#38; merchandise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: BennyBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.steelersdepot.com/2010/02/steelers-2009-offensive-line-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>BennyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelersdepot.com/?p=4053#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>If you tally up the total sacks allowed by O linemen, it looks as though the statisticians are attributing 20 sacks to Ben and the remainder to the O line.  Sounds about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you tally up the total sacks allowed by O linemen, it looks as though the statisticians are attributing 20 sacks to Ben and the remainder to the O line.  Sounds about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BennyBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.steelersdepot.com/2010/02/steelers-2009-offensive-line-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>BennyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelersdepot.com/?p=4053#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>Stats.com attributes 9 sacks for 39 yards to Colon.
http://hosted.stats.com/fb/playerstats.asp?id=7880
Although Flozell is no better, Colon is not a good NFL offensive lineman.  Not a big loss.  He shouldn&#039;t have been playing tackle anyway. Maybe they&#039;ll draft another tackle and move him to guard when they make the switch with Pouncey to center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stats.com attributes 9 sacks for 39 yards to Colon.<br />
<a href="http://hosted.stats.com/fb/playerstats.asp?id=7880" rel="nofollow">http://hosted.stats.com/fb/playerstats.asp?id=7880</a><br />
Although Flozell is no better, Colon is not a good NFL offensive lineman.  Not a big loss.  He shouldn&#8217;t have been playing tackle anyway. Maybe they&#8217;ll draft another tackle and move him to guard when they make the switch with Pouncey to center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t1mmy10</title>
		<link>http://www.steelersdepot.com/2010/02/steelers-2009-offensive-line-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>t1mmy10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelersdepot.com/?p=4053#comment-3552</guid>
		<description>essex did a little better than i expected. and foster did decent. for some of those I wonder if they took into account if ben held onto the ball for 4+ plus seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>essex did a little better than i expected. and foster did decent. for some of those I wonder if they took into account if ben held onto the ball for 4+ plus seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

