Categorized | Article, News

Agent Joe Linta Says Ravens Made A Dumb Move Last Off-season With QB Joe Flacco


When talking or writing about the Pittsburgh Steelers salary cap situation in the past, I often refer to the team having to pay for the sins that come with having a franchise quarterback under contract as to the main reason why it seems the organization is always up against the number. Unfortunately, several in the fan base can\’t wrap their head around this concept and instead want to point to Omar Khan and general manager Kevin Colbert mismanaging deals and the cap as to the reason why the team is always perceived as being one that is in “salary cap hell.”

Granted, the Steelers front office has made some bad decisions in the past when it comes to long-term contracts, but that is going to happen from time to time. They are future bets gone bad and most of the time it is related to players not being able to stay healthy. Willie Colon is the latest example of this, but in the end, it hasn\’t crippled the organization beyond repair.

The Baltimore Ravens are now a team that is about go through what the Steelers have gone through for the last several years with their salary cap thanks to them signing quarterback Joe Flacco to a new six-year, $120.6-million contract earlier in the off-season According to Flacco\’s agent Joe Linta, however, the Ravens could have gotten off a lot cheaper had they not squabbled over $1 million last off-season when the two sides were negotiating a five-year extension that would have averaged $16 million a year and it would have included Flacco\’s final year of his rookie contract to boot.

Jim Corbet of USA Today reported on Sunday the details of the botched negotiations listed above, and he also quotes Linta as not feeling sorry for the Ravens decision one bit.

“I\’m not apologetic for the fact this is really a three-year deal, there\’s no way they can afford $29 million a couple of years from now,\’\’ Linta said. “I\’m not apologetic. They chose to walk away.\’\’

The extra $1 million that the Ravens weren\’t willing to pay would have come in the final year of the proposed extension last off-season, and Linta says that decision cost the Ravens $35 million. Oh, and that $1 million reportedly wouldn\’t have even been guaranteed.

“I\’ve never in my life seen a dumber move, said Linta,” via the Corbet report. “I guess people can say, \’Well, Joe was dumb, too.\’ It could have been (dumb), God forbid, if he got hurt. But $1 million to Steve Bisciotti six years from now? That\’s like 100 bucks for you or me today.”

Linta goes on to point out that the Ravens will be forced to restructure Flacco\’s contract prior to the 2016 season because his cap number will jump up to $28.55 million that year as a result of option bonuses needing to be turned into signing bonuses in both 2014 and 2015. I pointed out this same thing in my post about Flacco\’s contract after the numbers came out. So essentially the Ravens can kicking begins next off-season and won\’t stop for a while.

Apparently, there are several in the Ravens fan base that are now mad at Flacco, because they now have a full understanding of what his new deal will do to the their salary cap situation down the road. I guess they already forgot about the Super Bowl, and the risk that Flacco took last season by playing out his rookie deal. Instead of being mad at Flacco; however, Ravens fans instead need to be mad at general manager Ozzie Newsome and owner Steve Bisciotti. They made a million-dollar gamble and lost as it relates to the future of the team salary cap wise.

Now, I am not going to say that one bad decision will cripple the Ravens franchise moving forward, but Newsome will really have his skills tested now that he has the sins of a franchise quarterback to pay for, and those sins could have cost the Ravens a lot less.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

About Dave Bryan

I am, I'm me. 40 something, retired and a life long Steelers fan.
  • Ahmad

    He wasn’t even worth that gigantic contract he got in the first place. Oh well it’s the Ravens’ problem not ours.

  • zyzak

    I am happy that the Ravens are in hell

  • Intropy

    Failing to offer him 16 million a year wasn’t dumb. Offering him 20 million a year one year later was. He’s an average QB who should be making average QB money, not that his agent could admit that.

  • NW86

    It’s easy to say in hindsight that it was a dumb move, but I’m sure they started out more than $1M apart. They negotiated, came close, but reached a point where they weren’t going to go any higher and Flacco wasn’t going to accept any lower. Flacco gambled, had a great season, and reaped the rewards. The Ravens gambled and lost money, but won the superbowl. It could have gone either way, you can’t blame anyone for the gamble.

    I also think we can agree that we are not as hamstrung by Ben’s contract as we could be. He’s making $12M/year in salary – $14.7M/year is the overall average of his contract including bonuses, and his cap hit, only because of past restructures pushing the can down the road, will be just under $19M the next 2 years, barring an early extension. No matter which of those numbers you look at, there are teams out there paying higher numbers for lesser QB’s right now.

  • Stephen Dale

    Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving team……

  • Jason White

    Giving 120 million to Ray Rice’s personal ball boy was dumb.

  • Pete

    It’s easy to look back in hindsight but I’d have to agree with Linta that $1 mil shouldn’t have derailed the deal. If you look at Flacco’s numbers and Ben’s numbers in his first 5 years, they’re very similar. Granted Ben has a higher QB Rating but Ben also throws more INTs as a percentage of his passes. The bottom line is that they didn’t think Flacco deserved the money because he hadn’t won anything yet while Ben won a SB in his 4th season. Winning a SB makes a QB more valuable. Yes, Bisciotti gambled and lost but he’s paying Flacco the SB premium with the hope he can lead the team to glory again. For him it will be well worth it if Flacco can deliver again.

  • Bradys_Dad

    Aren’t the Packers going to be in the same boat with Rogers ?

  • steeltown

    One thing you never want to do, in this day and age of QB’s being paid ridiculous amounts of money, is have to give a QB a huge contract immediately following a SB victory.. obviously, sometimes that might be out of your control, but ouch

If you enjoy our content & podcast, feel free to buy us a cup of coffee below.
Shop for 2012 Pittsburgh Steelers Nike and New Era Team Gear at Fanatics

Archives