Le’Veon Bell’s First Game Performance Compared To NFL Greats

By Jeremy Hritz

There aren’t many bright spots right now for the Pittsburgh Steelers, and it’s uncertain if there will be any sunshine in the remaining games. Yet if there is any player that is giving the team hope for the future, it is rookie running back Le’Veon Bell.

While Bell didn’t run for 200 yards, or even 100 yards in his regular season debut, he demonstrated that he possesses explosiveness and vision to manipulate defenses to create yards even when there don’t appear to be any. The promising fact to consider about Bell’s performance against the Minnesota Vikings is that it was his first game action since his preseason carries against the Washington Redskins. With twelve games remaining on the schedule, it is exciting to consider what Bell can do as he acquires more game experience and gets more comfortable in the Steelers offense.

So how does Bell’s first game performance stack up to some NFL running back greats? Take a moment and look at the chart below which details where Bell’s performance landed.

PlayerCarriesYardsRushing AvgRushing TDsReceptionsYardsReceiving TDs
Marshall Faulk231436.231310
LaDainian Tomlinson361133.1421120
Adrian Peterson191035.401601
Curtis Martin191025.41000
Eric Dickerson31912.90000
Barry Sanders9717.91000
Le’Veon Bell16573.624270
Jerome Bettis5244.80160
Tony Dorsett4112.750000
Emmitt Smith2210000
Walter Payton80001-40
AVERAGE15.6653.90.80.8120.09

At first glance, Bell’s performance doesn’t leap out of the table, as his average yards per carry are below the average of the greats on this list at 3.6 yards, as are his total yards. However, of the backs listed, Bell is only one of five that scored a rushing touchdown in his first game, and only one of three to score two touchdowns, joining the company of Marshall Faulk and LaDainian Tomlinson. When you consider that Bell did this on only 16 carries, while it took Faulk 23 carries and Tomlinson 36 carries, it makes his accomplishment that much more impressive.

Another notable aspect of Bell’s performance was his work catching the football. Again, while he didn’t have an all-world game, he did catch four passes for 27 yards. Out of the eleven backs listed above, Bell caught the most passes in his first game, though not for the most yardage. Could this be an indication of the versatility he will bring to the Steelers throughout his career?

So where will Bell’s performance stack up among NFL greats at the end of the season, and just what will that mean for the Steelers currently lifeless 2013? If Bell would average 57 yards per game for the remainder of the year, he would end up with 741 rushing yards, which would be a disappointing total. It seems more likely that Bell will string together a couple hundred yard games and accumulate a year-end rushing total of 1000+ yards.

As far as what that means for the team’s success, it probably isn’t enough to get the Steelers into the playoffs, but it should make the running game a legitimate threat, which is something that has been missing in Pittsburgh for a long time.

  • Kevin Gobleck

    man if Bell rushed for 8 carries and 0 yards we would have him exiled immediately

  • treeher

    The media has been stuck on the 1,000 yard standard even as the schedule has expanded from 12 to 14 to 16 games. A running back who stays healthy and plays all 16 games would only have to average 62.5 yards per game to reach 1,000. I don’t think that’s a measure of greatness. In other words, 1,000 yards today is ho-hum. I’m looking for 1,500 or more and then I’ll be impressed.

  • Ryan Parsonson

    You also have to consider the fact that he was coming of a foot injury. I think Bell is going to be household name in Pittsburgh!

  • charles

    Its a little early to make this comparison. What is disappointing about this article, Jeremy, is that you have thrown the towel in already….We are not done!

  • Virdin Barzey

    If he stays healthy, he will be a stud. The kid clearly has talent just like Jarvis Jones and Marcus Wheaton. Those guys are the future of this team.

  • Xclewsive

    Its just seems the Steelers are a lot more willing to throw LB passes. While he might now wow fans with his rushing numbers. What he does in total I believe will be just as impressive. LBs season prediction if he remains healthy

    197/829/9
    27/162/1

  • TheBlitz

    I tend to agree with you. I’m glad he had the performance he had. Fans around here (like you ?) wouldn’t have been very forgiving with him or the front office. I bet a lot of comments would have had: “Eddy Lacy” somewhere in between and you can guess why.

    I don’t care if he ever become a HOF. If he does, then great! I just hope he becomes a household name not for fumbles, negative yardage or injuries, but for obvious reasons.

  • r4kolb

    1,500 yards? With this O-line? Uh….No. Also it’s a passing league now. So I say 1,500 yards I’ll walk to Pittsburgh and shake his hand!!! (281 miles)

  • r4kolb

    Uh chuck……Elvis has left the building..and The Fat lady has sung.

  • charles

    No need for you to be hanging around then….

  • treeher

    I’m not saying that’s what I expect of Stillers. I’m saying that should be the measure of outstanding performance league-wide.

  • Busforever

    His reads on the field, the way he ran, mean more than his stats. Touchdowns and carries in a 1st game are influenced by situational football, and talent around him.