Mike Wallace Grateful For The Money During His Time In Miami


Remember Mike Wallace? Remember when he was in danger of becoming irrelevant? The Pittsburgh Steelers’ 2009 third-round wide receiver was an inconsistent performer after he hit free agency, and nearly disappeared in Minnesota last year. But he has been finding himself again this year with the Baltimore Ravens.

In fact, he has become their biggest receiver, catching 51 passes for 792 yards, averaging 15.5 yards per reception, and adding four touchdowns. That total includes a 95-yard  touchdown that he put up against the Steelers four weeks ago, which I’m sure did not sit well with too many fans of the Steelers.

Wallace’s departure from Pittsburgh was somewhat acrimonious, at least when it comes to public relations. He held out in training camp after his third season, at which point negotiations for a new contract ceased, and that money went to Antonio Brown. The following year, Wallace went to Miami, for five years and a $60 million contract.

While he did have some production there in his two years—his 10 touchdown receptions in 2014 tied a career-high that he had in Pittsburgh in 2010, his second season—his overall numbers have never been the same. In fact, this season is the first year in which he is averaging at least 13 yards per reception since he left the Steelers.

If his departure with Pittsburgh was somewhat acrimonious, then his leaving Miami was more so. Of course, they paid him a ton of money, but he was never in the same atmosphere there as he was here. He did not bear the burden of expectation well, and in one game, he even ended up benching himself.


But that doesn’t mean he didn’t enjoy his time there—or, more accurately, the money he earned there. The Ravens are playing the Dolphins on Sunday, his first time playing his former team since leaving, and he was understandably asked about what he thought about his time there in hindsight.

They gave me a lot of money in two years”, was his answer, according to Adam Beasley, Dolphins reporter for the Miami Herald. “I have no regrets”, he said. “I have no grudge, no nothing against those guys. It’s all love on my end. My life is a lot better because of those guys”.

Those guys traded Wallace forty percent of the way through the contract that they signed him to the Vikings, along with a seventh-round draft pick—all in exchange for a fifth-round draft pick, and a means of getting out of the bad contract that the former Pro Bowler is still so pleased with for making his life better.

Now, I’m not sure exactly would have said, nor do I think he said anything wrong. He merely spoke the truth, and that’s perfectly fine. But, man, if I were a Dolphins fan, that comment would certainly rub me the wrong way. “Thanks for the cash”. It should be noted, however, that Wallace denied taking himself out of the game, saying that he was benched by the coach.

About the Author

Matthew Marczi
Passionate Steelers fan with a bit of writing ability. Connoisseur of loud music. Follow me on Twitter @mmarczi.
  • Jacob

    I wonder if he, if he totaled everything up at the end of his career, would have actually made more sticking with the Steelers.

    At any rate, the Steelers saved a lot of cap space signing Antonio Brown instead of him, and they ended up with arguably the best receiver in the NFL. Your departure was a great deal for the Steelers too, Mike. Thanks!

  • dany

    I love his honestly, for real

  • pittfan

    He has no regrets??? Is he serious? How self centered can you get? The team paid him HUGE $$$ relalative to what they got in return and HE doesn’t have any regrets? Boy, that’s big of him.
    Sheesh.

  • RickM

    Actually I read the article and thought he handled it well, refusing to take a potshot at Philbin or Tannehill. It was kind of a good clean-up after a low class tweet “7 days”.

  • dennisdoubleday

    Like you would have turned down the contract, were you in his shoes.

  • dennisdoubleday

    The Dolphins made a mistake, no doubt. Wallace didn’t.

  • pittfan

    that’s got nothing to do with what i said. but I guartantee you, if I cashed the checks he did and gave them the crappy numbers he gave them in exchange, I would not be talking about ME having no regrets.

  • Matthew Marczi

    His numbers were far from crappy, generally speaking. In his two seasons there, he averaged 70 receptions for 896 yards and 7.5 touchdowns. Not the production the Dolphins were looking for for that money, obviously, but not “crappy” by any means.

  • pittfan

    But the numbers, relative to the money is the point

  • Matthew Marczi

    Well, I understand that, and after all that’s why they let him and a 7th rounder go for a 5th. I was just commenting on his numbers from a general perspective, not relative to the contract. Actually his 10 TDs in his second season with them is nothing to sneeze at. I just don’t think he was on the same page with Tannehill. Plus they had their o-line issues of course.